Class Actions

“Allowing a case to go forward as a class action where the critical requirements of class certification are absent – be it ascertainability, predominance or typicality – often creates a no-win situation for the defendant regardless of whether the claims involved have any substantive merit. As a result, defendants are frequently forced to settle non-meritorious claims simply because they have been denied procedural fairness. For this reason, PLAC is actively involved in amicus efforts, particularly at the appellate level, to ensure fairness in class certification proceedings.”—
John H. Beisner,
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Amicus Briefs
U.S. Supreme Court (pet.) (2015)
Authored by John H. Beisner and Jessica D. Miller, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Washington, D.C.
Ninth Circuit (2014)
Authored by John H. Beisner, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Supreme Court (2013)
Authored by John H. Beisner, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Washington, D.C.
Ninth Circuit (2013)
Authored by Alan J. Lazurus, Drinkle Biddle & Reath LLP, San Francisco, CA
Third Circuit (2012)
Authored by John H. Beisner, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Washington, D.C.
PA Supreme Court (2012)
Authored by James M. Beck, Reed Smith LLP, Philadelphia, PA
MN Supreme Court (2013)
Authored by Mark Olson, Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP, Minneapolis, MN